Dan Tudor

Join The Newsletter and Stay Up To Date!

Text Size Increase Decrease

The Importance of “Passion” vs. “Pressure” in RecruitingMonday, October 10th, 2011

There’s a big, big difference.

And quite honestly, most college coaches get it wrong.

When you’re trying to close a recruit, and get them to commit to your program, one of the worst things to do is to give them the feeling that they are being “pressured”.  Pressure might lead to an initial commitment, but in the long run that athlete is going to be a strong candidate for transferring or talking negatively about the way he or she was recruited.

In my opinion, after interviewing hundreds of current college prospects on how they made their decision in committing to a program, pressuring an athlete is bad.

Passion, on the other hand, is good.  Very, very good.

If you demonstrate passion to your prospect, it’s very likely you’ll achieve the same effects as you would hope to achieve by pressuring them: Excitement about your program, a strong reason for committing to you and your college, and a faster commitment.

Very few college recruiters, unfortunately, don’t do the passion part very well.

To give you an idea of what I’m talking about, and to show you what a big difference there is between the two, let me give you a few contrasting examples of “passion” versus “pressure” when recruiting your athlete:

Passion is when you tell your recruit why you like him, and what value you see him having in your program.  Pressure is when you matter-of-factly tell your recruit who else you’re recruiting at his position, and what he’s going to lose if he doesn’t make a fast decision.

Passion is when you tell them that you’ve decided you want her to play for you, and they officially ask her if she’s ready to commit because you are really excited about her future in your program.  Pressure is when you give her a 48-hour deadline after her campus visit to make her decision, or else you’ll yank the offer and give it to the next girl on your list.

Passion is when you smile and sit forward in your chair when you’re talking to your prospect.  Pressure is when you lean back, look at your cell phone every two minutes, and seem like you’re ready to walk your prospect over to admissions so they can start their exciting two hour PowerPoint presentation with the assistant to the assistant Director of Financial Aid so you can get back to work.

Passion is an impromptu visit to the office of a coach of another sport on your campus to introduce you to your recruit on campus so that they see the opportunity is with an athletic department family, and not just their sport.  Pressure is sitting with your prospect cooped-up in your office talking only about your sport.

Passion is taking a blank sheet of paper, sitting next to your recruit, and explaining to her what you see as the plan for her after she commits, and what the next twelve months look like for her when she joins your program.  Pressure is you talking about how she’ll have to pay her dues and wait her turn if she decides she wants to play for you.  (Note: Yes, that might be an honest assessment of their chances in your program.  But most recruits want to hear about what they need to do to beat out that Senior returning starter…because most of them think they can, and they’d like to see that you’re on board with that dream, too).

Passion is getting him spend time with the Freshmen and Sophomores on your team and letting them sell him on coming there.  Pressure is putting them with a 23-year old redshirt Senior who they have nothing in common with, and sending the two of them off to lunch together for two hours (true story example there…one of the more awkward observation sessions we did for one of our clients when we were on campus).

Passion is involving her parents in all aspects of the recruiting message, which is what most kids want according to our research.  Pressure is what she feels back at home when you don’t do that, and she wants to go to your program but doesn’t feel like she can because mom and dad never really got to know you as well as your conference rival that she’s going to settle on.

Passion is consistently keeping in touch with her, showing him that you are in it for the long haul and don’t take them for granted.  Pressure is what they feel when they try to figure out why you haven’t talked to them lately (they assume you might not be as interested in them as you once were, and begin to look for coaches who they think will be more interested).

That’s a short list, but an important list.

The big question now is: What are you going to do with this information, and how will it change the way you recruit this current class of prospects?

(No pressure).

 

There is still time to team up with Tudor Collegiate Strategies and let us map out a successful recruiting message and strategy for this year’s class.  We’ll bring a research-based methodology to your program, and help you create the best message possible for your prospects.  It’s working wonders for college coaches around the country, and we can do the same for your program.  Email Dan Tudor directly at dan@dantudor for a complete overview of what we do, and how we do it.

Share and Enjoy:
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Digg
  • Print
Share and Enjoy:
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Digg
  • Print

A Defense for Negative Recruiting When Bad News HitsMonday, August 29th, 2011

Like thousands of other people around the country, I was saddened to hear University of Tennessee women’s basketball coaching legend Pat Summitt announce health issues that she has started to battle.

It’s rare that someone in any profession – certainly in college coaching – that an individual has built such a unanimously respected coaching and personal resume as Coach Summitt has been able to do over the past many decades.

The day that she announced the news, my Twitter account was buzzing with activity and comments. 

A couple of comments caught my attention:  A few people made the case that this news would be used as negative recruiting material for competing coaches going up against Tennessee’s coaches.  In response to that, I made the claim that not only did it not have to be a negative, Tennessee could easily turn this news into a huge positive when it comes to recruiting the next few classes for the Lady Vols. 

Skeptical followers wondered how I could make such a claim.  I gave them some short answers (it’s Twitter, so that goes without saying, right?) but wanted to expand on that idea here today:  News like this does not necessarily mean recruiting woes for Tennessee women’s basketball, which Coach Summitt will continue to lead as long as her health allows (and if will, grit and determination is a factor, that means that Coach Summitt has a lot more wins left to engineer).

So whether you’re a recruiter at Tennessee, or a coach at another program that is facing potential bad news that could be used against them by a competitor, here are some theories we see working in the real world of college recruiting under trying circumstances:

Players will often rally around a challenging situation.  That includes a coach facing a health battle, a team facing disciplinary actions left-over from a previous staff, or some other bad news that a competing coach might be tempted to use against that program.

When we’ve worked with clients in the middle of this kind of situation, we find that the players will often naturally rally around each other and the program.  The benefit to the coaching staff?  Their athletes will sell the program more, speak more passionately about the coach and his or her talents, and try to connect with prospects on a more personal basis (through texting or social media).

In Tennessee’s case, it’s still a destination school with a great women’s basketball program.  Just as TV political commentators sometimes over-analyze a presidential candidate or an issue’s effect on the electorate, coaches and the sports media that follows them often get it wrong when it comes to how high school recruits will react to a challenging situation.

If you have a solid history of results in your program, a good college with solid academics, and a strong supporting cast helping to lead a team through the challenging situation, you can still get solid recruiting results.  A crisis does not necessarily mean a disaster when it comes to recruiting.

Programs enduring a crisis can actually insulate themselves against negative recruiting from competitors.  Not that Tennessee women’s basketball needs my advice in particular, but I’ll share four quick things that I would recommend any program do to make it harder for a program to use a situation in a negative way with recruits, based on our research:

  1. Speak openly about the situation.  Acknowledge that it’s tough, but you’ll pull through it.
  2. Offer a plan of how that’s happening.  Show your prospect that you’re not paralyzed by the situation, and that you and your staff are calmly handling things in an order manner.
  3. Focus on everything else that’s right about your situation: The school, the academics, the people, the staff…whatever you can show a recruit that will get them to look at the big picture instead of the crisis you are facing.
  4. Involve your team in telling the whole story about the situation.  It’s hard to give specifics here, because you’ll face a situation that is completely unique from the examples we’re sharing here today.  But whatever it is, make sure your team is brought in to help tell the story.  The worst thing any coach or school can do is to deal with a serious crisis outside of the team’s direct involvement.

Tennessee women’s basektball will get through this.  Not only will they survive this crisis, I wouldn’t be surprised if you see their players excel beyond what even they are aware they are capable of doing.  Coach Summitt will make sure of that as she begins to wind down her incredible and inspirational college coaching career.

The big question for you is this:  When you face a trying circumstance in your coaching career, what’s your plan to handle it effectively?

Tudor Collegiate Strategies is the nation’s leader in developing effective recruiting strategies for college coaches.  To inquire about working one-on-one with Dan Tudor, developer of the popular “Selling for Coaches” program for college recruiters, visit our popular website or email Dan directly at dan@dantudor.com.

Share and Enjoy:
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Digg
  • Print
Share and Enjoy:
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Digg
  • Print

Straight Talk on Negative RecruitingTuesday, November 2nd, 2010

We expect negativity in political campaigns.

I live here in California, and the 2010 midterm elections had plenty of mud-slinging.  In the governors race between Meg Whitman, the Republican, and Jerry Brown, the Democrat, negative campaigning was plentiful: The Republicans used negative ads, and the Democrats used negative ads.

Political pundits decry the use of negative ads in political races.  Most of us hate the junk mail that we get during elections, and we can’t wait until all the political ads stop cluttering the TV airwaves. 

So, why in the world do politicians continue to use negative ads when it’s clear that the rest of us – the voters – universally despise them?

Simple:

They work

There are even some scientific studies that explain why they work, and why politicians from both parties would be foolish to stop using negative ads to win elections.

Which brings me to the topic that is a little closer to all of our hearts:  Negative recruiting in college sports.

Let me say at the start that I never teach, nor do I recommend that a coach should engage in, negative recruiting.  I’ll explain why in a moment.  That being said, negative recruiting abounds.  Some coaches that you know and recruit against have probably used negative recruiting techniques against you at some point in the past. 

So why would a fellow coach stoop to such depths and sacrifice their personal integrity and reputation among his or her peers by giving their prospect misleading messages about their competitors?

Simple:

They work.

That’s right, for all the complaining and protesting that goes on, you have to admit that negative recruiting does work much of the time.  Here’s why:

  • It fills a void in the mind of the prospect.  Many coaches do a poor job of providing enough positive reasons for a prospect to choose their school.  That leaves an uncomfortable void in their mind.  They need something – even something negative – to help form an opinion about your program.
  • It satisfies an emotional needThe study I referenced earlier found that 100% of us have a significant emotional response to viewing a negative political ad.  Read that again…we all respond emotionally to negative ads.  That emotion helps us form a more complete opinion on a candidate, whether right or wrong.  When a coach slips in a little negative recruiting, it has a good chance of resonating with a prospect who is actively looking to form an opinion about another coach.
  • It gives them a reason to take action.  I can’t tell you how many times a client has come to us complaining that a competitor gave their prospect a short deadline for taking their scholarship offer, or else that offer would be pulled and given to another recruit.  To our client’s shock and dismay, the prospect takes the bait and commits to their competitor.  How can this happen?  Why would a prospect choose a coach who puts pressure on them and uses a forcefully negative tactic to gain a commitment while the other coach has given them plenty of space to make a decision and acted professionally throughout the recruiting process?  Many times, pressure elicits a response.  In the political world, candidates will use negative advertising to actually suppress voter turnout for their opponents!  Like it or not,whether it’s politics or college sports, it works.

O.K., let’s back up a little for just a moment.  Now that I’ve given you three solid reasons why negative political ads – and negative recruiting – works, how can I come out against negative recruiting as an effective strategy?

First, it’s not the ethical or professional thing to do as a college coach who should have the best interests of a high school student-athlete at heart.  Secondly, we find that the positive results are short-lived:  Prospects who are pressured into choosing a particular college are most likely to be dissatisfied with their overall college experience, or even transfer out of a program.

So, how can you ensure that you maintain your professional approach as a college recruiter, while insulating yourself against negative recruiters who are chasing your prospect?  Here are a few key ideas we’ve seen work over the past few years in working with colleges around the country:

  • Warn your prospect that other coaches might try to negatively recruit them.  Tell them that other coaches might try to scare them away from your college or program, and explain why this is a sign of weakness on their part.  One of the best things you can do is to frame the discussion in your favor…make your prospect focus on recognizing the act of negative recruiting itself, rather than the content of the negative recruiting message as it relates to your program.
  • Bring up a potential negative about your program, and tell your prospect what to think about it.  Many coaches we work with begin their client relationship with us furiously trying to hide potential negatives:  Older dorms, their remote location, bad athletic performance…whatever it is, we see a lot of coaches running scared much of the time.  We recommend taking the opposite approach: Bring up a negative, and let your prospect know how to think about it.  Older dorms?  That shouldn’t matter…it’s all about the great relationships that you’re going to build as part of your team, and besides, your team ends up loving their dorm rooms after they decorate them and make them their own.  Framing how your prospect should think of your dorms as soon as possible, in this example, is key to overcoming your competition’s negative recruiting later. 
  • Give your prospects a consistent, logical, passionate message as to why they should choose you.  Don’t leave any voids, and don’t allow them to look at another coach’s school with any questions left unanswered about your program.  If you want help crafting that effective message, click here.

One more important thought on this topic:  If you are seeing negative recruiting working against you, I would candidly tell you that you might be the reason for it’s effectiveness. 

The good news?  You also have the power to twart it’s effectiveness.  But you have to take action, and – just like a savvy politician – you’ll need to give your audience a passionate, logical reason to ignore those ”negative ads” and cast their vote for your program instead.

Determining the best strategy for your college’s athletic department can be challenging.  If you need help, click here to find out about our On-Campus Workshops that we lead at colleges around the country, and how we can help you and your fellow coaches to win more recruiting battles than ever before.  Or, email Dan Tudor directly at dan@dantudor.com for more information. 

Share and Enjoy:
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Digg
  • Print
Share and Enjoy:
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Digg
  • Print

Categories

Archives